<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>DotSauce Magazine - Latest Comments in Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://dotsauce.disqus.com/</link><description>Domain Names &amp; Web Development</description><atom:link href="https://dotsauce.disqus.com/hindus_speaking_out_against_god_domain_names/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:08:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-43784277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He was my favorite childhood pet after all... And far superior to all other canines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">motor wiper blades</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:08:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i agree with you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christina</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:41:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think these extensions are harmful to anyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aqeel Syed</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;.god is ridiculous but not necessarily because of religion but because ICANN is unable to manage what they have now so all these new extensions are unnecessary.  How is it we build the city without first building an infrastructure?  .GOD, .GOSH, .GEEZ ,,... how about .ICANN?  Is this all really necessary?  .COM is king and .MONEY is God so we don't need another extension.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The only extension ICANN need put up is .greed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Desouza</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:41:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be honest I really don't see any benefit to adding a .god extension.  We just keep adding more and more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Qualls</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459346</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I totally agree and thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sammrat</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:37:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459345</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i agree. thanx!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ilya Pashkov</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:44:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the information!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason King</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:04:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know about .GOD domains, but I'll be hacked off if they start doing .DOG domains and I don't get automatic dibs on "MrFuzzylegs.god".  He was my favorite childhood pet after all...  And far superior to all other canines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can't imagine them actually going through with the God thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy M</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:05:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459341</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These persons are trying to divide all the peoples...&lt;br&gt;While all knows that god is one. So, why we take these sorts of foolish steps....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sonia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 07:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a bad idea. &lt;br&gt;.god domains would be an insult to God. Religious organizations should use .org domains or a new one like .rel &lt;br&gt;Love your blog&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jimmy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:47:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really don't understand how a new ending for domain names can create more conflicts than the world of religion already has. Maybe people should stop to tell other people what to believe and just accept each others religion. Than a simple thing like a religious ending for domain names could be seen as a good thing and not like something is causing more problems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J32 Design (j32design)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:22:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I thought that .org was for churches and religious institutions...definitely not a good idea to implement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AutoSpector</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:05:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459337</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He is absolutely right. Talk about electronic warfare!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Let's take down the Christians! Let's take down the Muslims!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It has BAD written all over it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johnny</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:48:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459336</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm Hindu, and I really couldn't care less if there were .god or .hindu domains out there. But, I'm sure a lot of other people would protest, so I think it would be best if those TLDs weren't used.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fishyfiction</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hindus Speaking Out Against .GOD Domain Names</title><link>http://www.dotsauce.com/dot-god/#comment-12459335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i agree with you. i dont think it will happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marta</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>